.
Feedback

Missing Campaign Signs Frustrate Candidates

Jay Johnson, campaign manager for 6th Congressional District candidate Jesse Young, is fed up after multiple signs go missing in Gig Harbor.

With the election season in full swing, political campaign signs have also hit the street and homes in full force around communities, including Gig Harbor.

However, one Gig Harbor resident Jay Johnson is not happy with signs mysteriously disappearing.

“You put them up one day and the next day, they’re gone,” he said. “It’s pretty bizarre.”

Unlike in the past, he said the signs are disappearing regardless of the party.

“It’s not just us. It’s everybody,” he said.

Johnson, who also serves as the campaign manager for 6th Congressional District GOP candidate Jesse Young, said he and his campaign volunteers have caught several people taking down signs without their permission.

He even found an area off the intersection of 24th Street NW and 14th Avenue NW that has become dumping grounds for political signs—both past and current.

Johnson said he learned about the area when he stopped to thank a Pierce County worker for mowing the grass around the political signs.

Removing campaign signs without permission is illegal, the confirms.

So far, Young’s campaign has put up about 8,000 signs throughout six counties from Aberdeen to Port Angeles, and a third of them have gone missing, Johnson said.

“I understand that the signs are ugly. I don’t like them,” he said. “But we got a process in this country in electing people, and one of the ways they get known is by putting up their signs. It’s an inexpensive way of contacting a large number of people.”

But when signs suddenly go missing, it can get pretty pricey.

According to Johnson, the cost of printing and assembling a single sign can run anywhere from $4 to $10.

“Not everybody can get a volunteer force together to do all the labor for free. So you have to pay somebody to put them out and even maintain them,” he said.

For candidates with smaller campaigns like Jerry Costello, who’s running for Pierce County Superior Court, Johnson said funding is typically produced out-of-pocket or from donations.

“They don’t typically raise a whole lot of money so if they got to spend $7,000 to $8,000 on signs, that’s a lot of money for small campaigns,” he said.

On the other hand, Young's Democratic counterpart, Derek Kilmer's communications director Matthew Randazzo said they have not seen a signficant increase in missing signs.

“We’ve had a couple incidents, but nothing unusual,” he said. “It happens every campaign.”

For those who are counting down the days until the signs go away, parties are required to remove them within seven days after the Nov. 6 elections. 

BG July 9, 2012 at 11:57 am
It is amazing that politicians believe that campaign signs will help them. Where is the logic in that? And, if the signs do convince a person to vote for the candidate, then those voters are morons. What, with the Internet, anyone can research and READ information about the candidate. Wow, it is illegal to remove the signs? I guess the people who depend on the signs to cast their vote, voted for this. It does not surprise me that people are taking the initiative and removing the annoying signs. The signs do nothing to enhance the already beautiful Northwest. How about an election to ban election signs?
WA6th July 9, 2012 at 01:13 pm
BG, it is considered 6 points of contact, one of which is name recognition through seeing a candidates name over and over again coupled with ads, internet, flyer's etc.
Mark Hoppen July 9, 2012 at 01:40 pm
I don't know BG, signs enabled Dale Washam to beat out Terry Lee and get elected to a position that any reasonable person should have known Washam could not handle. Unfortunately, election signs and uninformed, simple name recognition matter more in an election than an advocate of democracy would like to admit. I once remember reviewing vote counts on Day Island for a school levy, and I noticed Day Island voters had cast a majority vote for a new parks commissioner who was involved in a well-publicized political domestic mess and who had previously, tragically, and very publicly, died. The deceased candidate won handily on Day Island. (if Jesse doesn't survive the primary, then it won't be for lack of signs :)
Walker Sandlin July 9, 2012 at 01:53 pm
I think there is a 3 day limit on any signs placed in the county right-of-way, then the county can remove them. I don't think anyone wants to see them. The people in this community are pretty educated and will probably be well informed on the candidates without the signs. When I was growing up, political signs where in people's front yards to show their support for candidates. Volunteers knocked on doors to ask for their permission to place a sign. There was never any placed on county right-of-ways. I think those as well as Realtor signs should be banned from being placed on county right-of-ways. As for the 6 points of contact, make it 5!
hillary July 9, 2012 at 02:03 pm
I totally agree! The signs are ridiculous. If you are voting based on a name you saw on a sign you are a moron and should not be voting. With that said, that is why the signs are there, to attract the morons who shouldn't be voting because they are uninformed!
Julie P July 9, 2012 at 02:17 pm
I hate the signs. It completely trashes up any area they are polluting. Personally, I think if you need these signs in order to decide who to vote for, you shouldn't be voting! At the very least there should be a time limit. They've been up for months already and the election is still several months away. We should have to look at them for the better part of a year! 30 days before the election and down the day after the election.
shannon July 9, 2012 at 02:19 pm
I feel signs that have been placed all over the burnhham and round about areas look tacky and tasteless. As for signs in yards I can't tell my neighbors what to put in their yards so that is something I have to deal with. But I shouldn't have to deal with looking at them plastering the streets of my community on city boulevards and on the side of the road. Something does need to be done about that. I honestly ignore the signs I don't bas my vote on a sign I base it on my knowledge and what is in my familys best interest so I do agree that they are pointless.
Linda Glein July 9, 2012 at 02:54 pm
While I won't pull up the signs (unless they are put on my property) I agree that they are a blight on our community. And, why oh why do candidates put up two or three in the same place? So much campaign money they can't figure out a better way to use it? I won't donate my money to candidates who waste it so foolishly.
Paul Thorpe July 9, 2012 at 02:57 pm
The signs are an eyesore and completely destroy the beauty of our area. I agree with Julie P, 30 days before the election and removal the day after is time enough. Personally, I make note of the worst literers so I know who not to vote for.
Rhonda Taylor July 9, 2012 at 03:11 pm
I understand the advantage of the signs. I believe, however, they've gotten out of control. Why can't there be a limit on the number of signs each candidate can place around a city? That way, the cost is limited for everyone, we see the names of the people running and can do more research on them, and the people erecting the signs can choose to put them in what they determine are strategic locations for their candidate. There are simply too many signs and it's gotten to the point where no one really looks at them anymore except in frustration.
turner July 9, 2012 at 03:28 pm
I see the county picking them up quite often, along with the real estate signs, ask them, they probably are not as many missing as thought. Saw them being picked up along 302 last week.
Akiko Oda (Editor) July 9, 2012 at 03:44 pm
Correction: Matthew Randazzo is Sen. Kilmer's campaign spokesman, not campaign manager.
Tom H July 9, 2012 at 03:50 pm
Your complaints will fall on deaf ears. Our politicians think we are dumb animals. Also, they could care less about fouling up our local environment, as demonstrated by the visual pollution these signs cause.
George Weis July 9, 2012 at 04:56 pm
I can tolerate the political signs BUT if they are considered appropriate, then the County can stop stealing signs posted by nonprofit organizations notifying the public of scheduled community events. This has happened repeatedly to organizations I volunteer for. Highly inappropriate, malignant behavior!
Joseph kimball July 9, 2012 at 05:14 pm
I believe the signs are a huge eyesore to the community and are being placed in areas without consent. The idea of ten signs for one possible elect is out of control and a waste of funds. Spend that money to promote yourself at community events where people will actually HEAR what you have to offer us. Ask permission to post your signs before just pounding them in the ground, Don't be a lazy candidate, get off your butt and maybe go out and hold your sign and when you are done, take it home with you. I for one am not going to vote for you based on how colorfull and bold your sign is. Also just to clarify, as they have been posted on my front yard without permission and on our private community street, I have taken the liberty to remove them and place them kindly in the TRASH! They want us to have respect for them and vote for them, well have respect for us and our community as well!
Marian Berejikian July 9, 2012 at 08:18 pm
Signs in our Right of Ways are not just unsightly, but in some areas obstruct the traffic line of sight. When I see the names on those signs, I make a note NOT to vote for them since they did not seem to consider public safety important and do not exercise common sense in the sign's placement.Pierce County has dealt with this issue before (Excerpt from article - County leaders reach agreement on sign removal - Jul 13 2009). The Pierce County Council and Executive Pat McCarthy have agreed on a plan for removing illegal signs placed in the county right of way.
These signs are unsafe, unsightly and unlawful, and residents have said they want them removed. Political campaign signs will continue to be protected as a form of free speech, and real estate open house signs may remain as long as they are within the provisions of the recently revised law. Illegal signs that are removed will be recycled. A two-person crew will implement the sign removal program. Included in their efforts will be photo documentation of each sign to prove that it was placed in the county right of way and a record of its removal. This level of control, tracking and documentation is necessary to enable enforcement of the law for repeat violators...
Maggie Anderson July 13, 2012 at 05:02 am
"So far, Young’s campaign has put up about 8,000 signs throughout six counties from Aberdeen to Port Angeles, and a third of them have gone missing, Johnson said."
I think most of those signs are in and around Gig Harbor! I was under the impression that the signs were supposed to be on private property - in that case, I agree that the signs should not be taken down without permission. However - on city or county property, isn't it a bit of a no-no? I understand that Mr. Young is not the only candidate guilty of this (if I am even correct in my understanding) but why on earth do there have to be SO many of them for this one particular candidate? At one point, across from the old Gig Harbor movie theatre (by Les Schwab) there were Jesse Young signs every 5 ft for the length of the divider. A few weeks ago, there were literally 29 signs (I counted, as I felt like I couldn't go 10 ft without seeing one!) on one side of the road between GHHS and the Chevron on Stinson - which is only about a 1 mile drive. Hands down, this candidate has more signs in and around Gig Harbor than any of the other candidates currently running for any office. It is an eyesore. I know of several people who have made a joke out of it on Facebook - "Going on vacation. Best part? Don't have to look at Jesse Young's signs for a week". It is overkill - I think I would rather risk being "unknown" above turning potential voters away because I irritated them with overexposing my campaign...

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Gig Harbor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Brent Champaco (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 05:57 pm
Ugh. That's not good, Starla. How many times a week do you and husband cross, or at least try toRead More cross that crosswalk.
Brooke Judge June 13, 2013 at 10:07 am
I have seen orange flags (like the kind you use on the boat with a water skier) used at crosswalksRead More in Redmond. Perhaps putting a PVC pipe in the ground on either side of the road or attached to the nearby sign posts with a few flags inside for you to hold out/carry to the other side when you're crossing would be helpful?
Starla Storset June 15, 2013 at 11:10 am
Brent, we cross it about at least once a week.
Jenny Manning (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 08:21 am
Welcome to the neighborhood!
Tracy Dullum June 13, 2013 at 02:57 pm
Welcome Tradewinds Treasure Gallery!!! We are super excited to have you in town!!!